PETA plumb new depths of hypocrisy

Joe Biden might have lost the race to the White House, but he still managed to beat Barack Obama in the race to the doghouse - getting a new puppy for his family weeks before Obama's family took possession of their much lauded 'First Dog.'

PETA, the vile 'animal rights' organisation, were on the warpath when they learnt about the new addition to the Biden family. Joe Biden had bought his new puppy from a breeder, not an animal shelter as PETA encouraged.

This inspired them to blow some of their annual $30 million budget on a series of controversial ads with the slogan 'Buy One, Get One Killed.'

In the words of PETA President Ingrid E. Newkirk: "Buying from a breeder kills a shelter dog's chance of being adopted. Four million unadopted animals are killed in shelters every year."

As is typical for PETA, their campaign is wildly hypocritical. While the message about adopting animals is correct, what Newkirk and Co. fail to mention is that PETA itself is the leading killer of shelter animals in the United States.

Despite having an annual budget in the tens of millions, PETA execute over 90% of all animals brought to their PETA adoption centers. Compare that to the Society of Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, who have a shoestring budget compared to PETA, yet successfully re-home 70% of animals brought to their shelter.

PETA is in a better situation than any so-called humane organization in America to actually save animals lives - yet they prefer to spend their budget on adverts encouraging children to give up eating meat, or abandon drinking milk.

To criticize the Bidens for not adopting a shelter pet is disgusting, considering that PETA murdered over 20,000 shelter animals in recent years.

PETA's cruelty towards animals is unprecedented. In 2007, two PETA employees (Adria Hinkle and Andrew Cook) went around the Virginia area visiting local animal shelters and taking healthy cats and dogs from them to 'rehome.'

After loading up 80 pets in their van (including 'Happy', a puppy belonging to Animal Control Officer Barry Anderson, who made Hinkle promise that the puppy would be re-homed and not 'put down') Hinkle and Cook idled their van in the parking lot of that same shelter and began systematically exterminating all of the animals with a (highly illegal) lethal injection.

Within twenty minutes of promising to rehome all these animals, the two PETA employees had killed every last one of them. They then proceeded to dump the bodies in the dumpster of a local Chinese restaurant, rather than dispose of the murdered animals properly.

Here are the results of PETA's handiwork:


So when Ingrid E. Newkirk warns that buying a puppy kills a shelter dog's chances of adoption, what she fails to mention that PETA will be doing the killing.

PETA are an absolute disgrace and anybody who donates money to them is contributing to animal cruelty.

PETA wastes money on 'Kittens of the Sea' propaganda

PETA Attempts To Make Fish More Adorable
by Anne Hillman

"PETA thought that by renaming fish sea kittens, compassionate people who would never dream of hurting a dog or a cat might extend that sympathy to fish, or sea kittens," PETA campaign coordinator Ashley Byrne says. Full story HERE.

Cynical brain washers of innocent children, accomplished scam artists, funders of domestic terrorism or plain, old animal murders, there are plenty of names you could call at PETA. They prefer to go by People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals.

Their latest attempt to manipulate the minds of innocent children (following their highly successful 'Your Mommy Kills Animals' campaign) has seen the development of a cute and child-friendly website dedicated to preserving the 'kittens of the sea' - known to rational people as 'fish.'

I wonder how much this campaign cost?

PETA annually bring in more than $30 million (donated by stupid people and brainwashed kids.) This makes them far and away the best funded 'animal rights' organisation in the world.

Their ill-gotten gains are spent on celebrity endorsements, child-propaganda (like the the 'sea kittens' campaign) and funding environmental organisations - including some recognized by the FBI as 'domestic terrorists.'

Despite their enormous financial resources, all this Hollywood shin-digging and terrorist-hugging comes at a price. Last year, for financial reasons, PETA was forced to euthanize 90% of the animals in brought into its animal shelters. In total, they've exterminated 20,000 healthy cats and dogs in the interests of 'cost effectiveness' - more than any other humane organisation in the United States.

[PETA and the word 'humane' do not belong in the same sentence - Editorial Bear]

Some of 80 perfectly healthy animals murdered by PETA in the car-park of an animal shelter.

All that advertising on MTV is expensive, apparently!

It's rather a pity, too. The Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, who operate on a shoestring budget compared to PETA, managed to successfully re-home 70% of the animals they sheltered. If PETA really cared about animals, you'd think they'd attempt to match that success.

Unfortunately, PETA really don't care about animals. All they care about is encouraging dissent and vandalism, recruiting impressionable youngsters and - most importantly of all - generating huge amounts of money in order to keep their wretched organisation going.

PETA. If you have any concern for animals, they are the last organisation you should ever consider giving money to.

More hypocrisy from PETA...

As you're all well aware, I can't stand the animal-murdering frauds who call themselves PETA - The People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals [Or, more accurately, Parasites for the Enrichment of Their (own) Association - Editorial Bear]

At the moment, this vile organisation is attacking the organisers of Wimbledon - who have found that the two hawks they employ aren't up to the task of scaring off London's militant pigeons and have resorted to shooting the flying rats rather than let them dive-bomb players and pedestrians with guano.

“Cruel and illegal behaviour!” A PETA spokesman called it.

And they should know! After all, PETA have been captains of cruel and illegal behaviour for years.

Read my previous post for more details - including the circumstances that let to this tragic picture of slaughtered puppies.

But just in case you were fuzzy - let me lay out the basics for you. PETA raise upwards of $25 million dollars a year in the United States - which they donate to bona fide terrorist organisations or squander on fraudulent adverts urging impressionable children to give up eating meat or wearing leather (the best was 'Your Daddy's a Murderer' with a picture of a blood-hungry father returning from his 'genocidal' fishing expedition.)

Yet despite raking in such huge amounts of money each year - PETA is actually responsible for murdering more animals than any other so-called 'humane' organisation.

PETA aggressively lay claim to abandoned and homeless puppies, kittens and animals - and then murder over 90% of them every year. They claim they can't afford to do anything except 'euthanize' these animals - but that's not true. If they used their fortune to pay for keeping these pets long enough to re home them, most of them could be spared.

Other humane organisations did - and on a fraction of PETA's budget. Virginia Beach SPCA, right down the road from PETA’s Norfolk headquarters, managed to adopt out almost 70% of the animals in its care last year.

So the fact remains - PETA fraudulently squeeze money out of ill-informed animal lovers and then WASTE all of it. Since their wretched organisation's inception, they have failed to do one single positive thing for the welfare of animals - and have, in fact, slaughtered thousands of them.

PETA murders animals - and anybody who willingly donates money to them is as guilty as they are of animal cruelty.

Animal 'Rights' - They can't 'bear' to let Knut live.

There is probably no more heart wrenching story in the press at the moment - especially considering we Brits are far more concerned about animal's lives than people's.

Polar Bear cub Knut, born in Berlin Zoo, was rejected at birth by his mother. His brother, similarly rejected, died - but zookeeper Thomas Doerflein refused to let Knut suffer the same fate. Bottle feeding him, the German zoo keeper fought to keep the baby bear alive, even strumming Elvis hits on his guitar as he watched over him.

The result is nothing short of miraculous. The adorable bear survived, despite the odds. Today, Knut was presented to the public for the first time.

It sounds like a fairytale story - but not everybody is happy to see Knut beat the odds.

Animal Rights Activists demand that "the bear should die."

Proving once again that the 'Animal Rights' scum have no interest in protecting the lives of animals, they're demanding that the zoo murder poor little Knut, claiming that it is "unnatural" that the bear should have survived his mother's rejection.

Despite the fact that Polar Bears are endangered, the 'Animal Rights' activists claim that nature should have taken it's course - and since it hasn't, the zoo should do 'the right thing' and put Knut down.

Just the mere idea makes my head spin. How could so called 'Animal Activists' want to slaughter Knut? He's a tiny, innocent bear. It just goes to show that these murderous protesters value their deranged 'principles' over the lives of the animals they laughingly claim to protect.

They are unmitigated, disgusting scum. If there was any justice in the world, those bastards would get their wish and encounter Knut face to face in a few years time - when he's grown into an aggressive, 1,300 lb adult bear and has an appetite!

Animals Rights Protesters Foiled

Oxford University foils animal rights attack

Monday February 26, 09:50 PM

LONDON (AFP) - An arson attempt by supposed animal rights activists at Oxford University was foiled Monday after staff discovered a web posting bragging about the planned attack. Full story here.

It was only a few days ago that I posted about the terrorist activities of so-called 'animal rights' activists. Here is more evidence about how dispicable they are.

Oxford University has been a target of 'animal rights' protestors for a number of years. Important work into medical research is conducted by the university and unfortuntely, much of that essential research has to be conducted on animals.

For the delusional activists, the fact that the university is helping to develop drugs and treatments that could cure life threatening illnesses doesn't matter. Nor does it matter that, after 9/11, even the IRA have admitted that terrorism is no longer a legitimate activity.

The 'animal rights' activists argue that animals are more important than people. In these circumstances, they might be correct. Perhaps they'd be willing swap their prison terms for a period in Oxford University Laboratories, undergoing experiments and treatments in the place of the guinea pigs and rabbits they're claiming to defend.

That really would show sacrifice and dedication to the animal rights cause.

However, as I've said before, the 'animal rights' movement has nothing to do with the rights of animals. It just gives a flimsy excuse for a lot of violent and angry kids to make bombs and hit people with bats.

Animal "rights" stalls being SHUT DOWN!

Police close animal rights stalls

Thursday February 22, 08:28 AM

Street stalls collecting tens of thousands of pounds a year have been closed in what police say is a clampdown on the funding of the criminal actions of animal rights extremists.

Twenty-one people have been charged following the six-month crackdown, which targeted stalls manned in central London locations including Oxford Street. Full story here.

Something to cheer me up!

As you know, despite being a lover of animals, I detest the so called "animal rights" movement. Their horrendous stall, preaching lies about Iams and demanding an end to cancer-curing research on animals, is a blight on Winchester High Street.

And ours is not the only High Street they infest. There are Animal Rights stalls across the country, collecting money for the 'animal rights' movement. I put that in inverted commas, because it's quite clear that this movement cares very little for the genuine welfare of animals.

Generally manned by a bunch of ignorant, opinionated idiots, the "animal rights" movement has been the major source of funding for criminal and terrorist organisations that cause millions of pounds worth of damage every year, inadvertently kill hundreds of animals and victimise doctors and researchers doing valuable work to help find cures for deadly diseases.

Foremost of these organisations is the Animal Liberation Front - classed by the Department of Homeland Security in 2005 as a Terrorist Threat.

And yet, they receive thousands of pounds worth of donations every year. One of the major sources of this funding are these High Street stalls, where crusty youngsters demand money from passers-by by flashing them heart wrenching pictures of puppies and kittens.

This money then goes on to help fund such "worthwhile" projects such as releasing 6,000 mink into the wild from a fur factory in Ringwood. In what the RSPB called "an act of monumental stupidity," thousands of birds were killed by the mink and the 6,000 'liberated' animals were soon decimated by starvation, or being crushed on the nearby roads.

Instead of 'saving' these animals, the Animal Liberation Front actually massacred them.

In 1999, reporter Graham Hall infiltrated the ALF to expose their criminal activities, filming members of the ALF planning to make bombs and choosing viable terror targets. In retaliation for this betrayal, the ALF kidnapped Graham, strapped him to a chair and branded the letters ALF into his back with a burning brand.

In 2006, the ALF decided to 'liberate' a Scottish fish farm in Oban. Unfortunately for thousands of farm reared halibut, the only destination they escaped to was the heavenly hereafter.

From beating people with axe handles, to smashing the fronts of butchers shops, the Animal Liberation Front has shown for the last thirty years that they have no regard for life at all - human or animal. Just like the disgusting PETA organisation, the ALF manipulate people into funding their activities. However, while PETA merely focuses it's murderous activities on the animals it claims to protect (murdering 14,4000 of them in 2005) the ALF actually goes out to create mayhem, destroy property, cause injury and slaughter animals.

It is a disgusting organisation and the fact that the Police are cutting off one of it's major sources of funding is a wonderful thing and will help make an entire generation of people and animals safer.

If you see one of these 'Animal Rights' stalls in your High Street, do not donate ANY money to them and report them to the police.

Justice is failed - PETA murderers cleared by NC Court

PETA, the repugnant 'animal rights' organisation that slaughters over 14,400 animals a year because it squanders donations on ridiculous, offensive and libelous advertising, managed to wiggle their way out of animal cruelty charges today.

The court case, centered around two PETA employees who lied in order to convince animal shelters in North Carolina to surrender animals into their custody, was centered around how between 30 and 80 perfectly healthy animals were 'put to sleep' by the two PETA employees, with unlicensed lethal injections and then dumped in the trash of a nearby convenience store.

"It's a disgrace," said Andrea Press, a member of Responsible Dog Owners of Eastern States. "PETA preaches to everybody not to hurt and kill animals. And they just proved it's OK for them to do it. They're hypocrites."

How many thousands of dollars of ernest donations were squandered in defending Andrew Cook and Adria Hinkle, the two alleged human beings who claimed to be 'animal lovers' even while they were murdering puppies and kittens in the back of their van?

DO NOT GIVE ANY MONEY TO PETA.