PETA wastes money on 'Kittens of the Sea' propaganda

PETA Attempts To Make Fish More Adorable
by Anne Hillman

"PETA thought that by renaming fish sea kittens, compassionate people who would never dream of hurting a dog or a cat might extend that sympathy to fish, or sea kittens," PETA campaign coordinator Ashley Byrne says. Full story HERE.

Cynical brain washers of innocent children, accomplished scam artists, funders of domestic terrorism or plain, old animal murders, there are plenty of names you could call at PETA. They prefer to go by People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals.

Their latest attempt to manipulate the minds of innocent children (following their highly successful 'Your Mommy Kills Animals' campaign) has seen the development of a cute and child-friendly website dedicated to preserving the 'kittens of the sea' - known to rational people as 'fish.'

I wonder how much this campaign cost?

PETA annually bring in more than $30 million (donated by stupid people and brainwashed kids.) This makes them far and away the best funded 'animal rights' organisation in the world.

Their ill-gotten gains are spent on celebrity endorsements, child-propaganda (like the the 'sea kittens' campaign) and funding environmental organisations - including some recognized by the FBI as 'domestic terrorists.'

Despite their enormous financial resources, all this Hollywood shin-digging and terrorist-hugging comes at a price. Last year, for financial reasons, PETA was forced to euthanize 90% of the animals in brought into its animal shelters. In total, they've exterminated 20,000 healthy cats and dogs in the interests of 'cost effectiveness' - more than any other humane organisation in the United States.

[PETA and the word 'humane' do not belong in the same sentence - Editorial Bear]

Some of 80 perfectly healthy animals murdered by PETA in the car-park of an animal shelter.

All that advertising on MTV is expensive, apparently!

It's rather a pity, too. The Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, who operate on a shoestring budget compared to PETA, managed to successfully re-home 70% of the animals they sheltered. If PETA really cared about animals, you'd think they'd attempt to match that success.

Unfortunately, PETA really don't care about animals. All they care about is encouraging dissent and vandalism, recruiting impressionable youngsters and - most importantly of all - generating huge amounts of money in order to keep their wretched organisation going.

PETA. If you have any concern for animals, they are the last organisation you should ever consider giving money to.

More hypocrisy from PETA...

As you're all well aware, I can't stand the animal-murdering frauds who call themselves PETA - The People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals [Or, more accurately, Parasites for the Enrichment of Their (own) Association - Editorial Bear]

At the moment, this vile organisation is attacking the organisers of Wimbledon - who have found that the two hawks they employ aren't up to the task of scaring off London's militant pigeons and have resorted to shooting the flying rats rather than let them dive-bomb players and pedestrians with guano.

“Cruel and illegal behaviour!” A PETA spokesman called it.

And they should know! After all, PETA have been captains of cruel and illegal behaviour for years.

Read my previous post for more details - including the circumstances that let to this tragic picture of slaughtered puppies.

But just in case you were fuzzy - let me lay out the basics for you. PETA raise upwards of $25 million dollars a year in the United States - which they donate to bona fide terrorist organisations or squander on fraudulent adverts urging impressionable children to give up eating meat or wearing leather (the best was 'Your Daddy's a Murderer' with a picture of a blood-hungry father returning from his 'genocidal' fishing expedition.)

Yet despite raking in such huge amounts of money each year - PETA is actually responsible for murdering more animals than any other so-called 'humane' organisation.

PETA aggressively lay claim to abandoned and homeless puppies, kittens and animals - and then murder over 90% of them every year. They claim they can't afford to do anything except 'euthanize' these animals - but that's not true. If they used their fortune to pay for keeping these pets long enough to re home them, most of them could be spared.

Other humane organisations did - and on a fraction of PETA's budget. Virginia Beach SPCA, right down the road from PETA’s Norfolk headquarters, managed to adopt out almost 70% of the animals in its care last year.

So the fact remains - PETA fraudulently squeeze money out of ill-informed animal lovers and then WASTE all of it. Since their wretched organisation's inception, they have failed to do one single positive thing for the welfare of animals - and have, in fact, slaughtered thousands of them.

PETA murders animals - and anybody who willingly donates money to them is as guilty as they are of animal cruelty.