You might also remember me mentioning the low-budget knock-off Asylum Films were producing, the 'other' Sherlock Holmes. Well, I got my mitts on a copy; and it was epic in an entirely different way.


If you haven't heard of Ben Syder before, don't be dismayed. Until this point, the biggest feather in his acting cap was doing the voiceover of a Gaz de France employee safety video; but despite being completely wrong for the part (short, undistinguished, with a slight Welsh burr) you can't really knock the fellow's acting chops and he gets stuck into the part enthusiastically enough.
Together, David-Lloyd and Syder end up with a Holmes/Watson partnership that's far more in keeping with the old Basil Rathbone/Nigel Bruce portrayal than the more equitable relationship in Guy Ritchie's movie.

And while this film is inferior to Guy Ritchie's big-budget Sherlock Holmes movie in just about every respect, it does feature one thing the Hollywood version was lacking... dinosaurs!





I think Paul Bales, the Hollywood hack who churns out scripts for Asylum Pictures like confetti, might not have even read a single Sherlock Holmes story before he penned Sherlock Holmes.
Why else bother with 'Thorpe'? Especially when Holmes has an actual deviously brilliant brother to spar against; the inimitable Mycroft.
And if you are going to go down the route of inventing new members of the Holmes clan, please don't add insult to injury by having le nouveau frere refer to Holmes as 'Robert' in another clever 'twist' on established canon (Sherlock's real name is 'Robert,' apparently; a secret only his newly-invented brother knows.)

Good luck to you if you do; it involves an aerial dogfight between Thorpe (in a steam-powered dragon) and Sherlock (in a hot air balloon) and, admittedly, some surprisingly adept computer graphics.

I'll be honest. I was desperate to like this film. It was filmed in Wales on a minuscule budget (reminding me of some student films I was involved with back in my days in Wales) and featured some plucky old sci-fi stars I was really rather fond of. Throw in Sherlock Holmes and some robotic dinosaurs and it seemed like it had the potential to be wonderful fun.
But in the end, it was just plain rubbish.
Not even one of those 'so bad it's good films.' Sherlock Holmes was just a disjointed, tedious, badly-written mess that insulted the intelligence of any unfortunate schlub foolish enough to rent it.
And it didn't have to be this way.
Admittedly, with such a small budget there was no way this direct-to-DVD monstrosity was ever going to be able to compete with Guy Ritchie's magnificent big-budget Holmes adventure; but there was so much that could have been done better.
A good thirty minutes could have been trimmed from the script to make the pacing at least slightly less sophomoric. The scriptwriter could have read a couple of Sherlock Holmes stories beforehand and created a plot that at least gave a nod to the institution which inspired it.
Ben Syder and Dominic Keating could even have swapped parts; and then we'd at least have a Sherlock Holmes who was slightly believable.
(Alternatively, this film might have been spared with some gratuitous nudity; but since it was aimed at a thoroughly PG audience there wasn't even that saving grace to defend it.)
So instead, we're left with an utterly pointless, tedious movie that's really not worth the time spent watching it. I generally try and give everything I review the benefit of the doubt; but in this case, doubt was about the only definable thing about this disjointed mess.
So my final verdict? Even the most dedicated fans of awful science fiction are advised to steer well clear. Sherlock Holmes is an unmitigated disaster from beginning to end.
No comments:
Post a Comment